One bite of the elephant at a time 11:46 AM

Photo from tsunami,
photographer unknown

In context of the current disaster in Japan, the loss of life, the possible nuclear meltdown, and the untold misery beset on hapless people, how significant or meaningful is an art project? If you are one of the victims or in any way connected with this disaster . . . no matter how peripherally, the obvious immediate answer is none at all. But, I think it is a matter of scale and perspective. Against a different backdrop and over a longer period of time, art can have a much longer and just as profound an impact as an immediate crisis. (Think Picasso’s Guernica.)

— By John Katz

www.johnkatz.net

www.29Pieces.org

www.29Pieces.tumblr.com

Guernica, by Pablo Picasso, 1937

Art and Scale 1:00 PM

History is full of evidence that big might not always be beautiful, but it is BIG, and therefore usually impressive to most people. Niagara Falls attracts more people than the stream at the bottom of your garden. People go on special trips to catch a glimpse of a whale, not so for Freddie your goldfish at home. The Great Wall of China can be seen from space, while your paltry Malibu mansion cannot. To a lesser extent the same holds true for art. Art does not have to be huge to be hugely magnificent, just take a look at Michelangelo’s David. But even in art the size rule does have an effect. Examples are the Sistine Chapel, St Peter's Basilica, Picasso's Guernica. Size in art makes the art unavoidable, impossible to ignore, and forces itself upon the viewer. You can easily walk by a perfect 24 inch high 4000 year old Egyptian wooden figure in the Menil Collection, but you cannot easily do the same at some of the huge Titian paintings at the Tate in London. This ability of large artworks to make it difficult for the viewer sidestep or gloss over its existence makes size an important element in meaningful communication between the artist and the audience.

– John Katz

www.johnkatz.net

www.29Pieces.org

The Great Wall of China